sharbrough.net

I've often enjoyed Waymon Tisdale's jazz. I think he's the best musician who ever played in the NBA. Well, now comes Bernie Williams, who might be the best musician who ever played in MLB. This is a difficult title to claim, because these days it seems like every other pitcher is in a grunge band.

Bernie's baseball cred is unquestioned. Five times an allstar. Four gold gloves. MVP of the American League Championship Series in 1996. The man batted .297 over 16 seasons, hitting 287 homers. Very few jazz guitarists have any homers. Bernie mashed 22 more in the playoffs.

And as a jazz guitarist, Bernie is a very good centerfielder. He's not strong at any specific technical aspect of the instrument. I like his phrasing. It reminds me of Tom Grant. I have listened to Bernie cover Billy Joel and Kansas. Each time he creates a calm, caring feeling, without trying too hard to sound like the original.

Bernie is easy listening.

To give you an idea of what I mean, I suggest Go For It. There are no lyrics. The best time to put it on is on a sunny day when you can open the windows and play it a bit louder than you would if your mom was in the room.

James likes it.

Link: Hello It's Me.

Before emo was emo, Todd Rungren was emo. The album was released in Feb 1972. That's three years before the birth of Tobey Maguire (emo spiderman). Don't get me wrong. Todd Rungren is not an "emo musician." I don't think that there is a category that can contain Mr Rungren's oeuvre. It would take more than six blind men to improperly describe this elephant.

But that's not important. What's important is that "Hello, It's Me" is a silly song. The persona sounds like the biggest loser ever to hang around a girl without expressing his feelings. If you ever get where your real life has you down, if you feel like a loser and want to wallow in it, and you can't find the razor blades, and your wife has hidden the ice pick, just kick back with a drink and listen to this song.

You'll feel bad enough that your real life will look pretty appealing.

I confess that I also liked "We Gotta Get You a Woman." But if you've only heard the soft ballads, you've missed the message from Mr Rungren. Kick the tires on the rest of his work. He put plenty of effort into it. The least you can do is taste it.

Nothing explains this song quite like seeing James Taylor play it on Youtube. [link] It's a bit of an anthem from the time. The album Sweet Baby James was released in March of 1970, and the single a month or so later. Discussions about this song are complicated  by the passage of 40 years since its release. Mr Taylor still plays and sings the song, but he sure looks different.

I'd like to avoid spending a lot of time on the "meaning" of "Fire and Rain." Taylor has commented enough times that we know who Suzanne is, and what "flying machines in pieces on the ground" means. Suzanne was a friend who committed suicide, The Flying Machine was an old band that didn't work out, and fire and rain referred to electric shock therapy and the cold showers that followed. And if you ask me, it isn't important.

The song is a song about loss, about happiness that fled like the end of a day. And there's a bit of hope – "Won't you look down upon me, Jesus. You've got to help me make a stand." And the use of past tense to describe the struggles hints that life goes on after loss, one day at a time.

Part of the point of this post is to describe the kind of talent that James Taylor represented in the time between 1968 and 1970. He was one of the first acts signed by Apple Records. When the Beatles think your music is good, that's saying something. His first album, James Taylor, was advertised on billboards like this one [link]. Taylor was a skilled songwriter from the beginning, and he had a unique style playing acoustic guitar. James Taylor didn't invent the hammer-on and the slide, but he did expand the art form. His skills with guitar were broader than I suspected at first. When I heard the "Steamroller Blues" I was shocked at how fast he played.

Any discussion about "Fire and Rain" would be incomplete without talking about the people who have covered it. Cher. Rick Wakeman. Don't bother listening to the Ramsey Lewis version – it's just too hard to imagine a soul-searing pain of shock therapy and cold showers with a cute rumba beat.

Growing up, I liked the Blood Sweat & Tears cover – it was different enough from the original, and yet still had that stark feeling that I think the song calls for.

"Fire and Rain" was simply the advent of a long career for a great artist, a folk singer-songwriter who  brings a hope, an enthusiasm, a love of life, and a wonderful artistic gift to us mass-peoples.

Last week, I tripped over the late Waymon Tisdale's "Way Up." I liked the album and the song (both have the same name), and not long after I got it on iTunes, he passed away. I'm sad that there won't be more Waymon Tisdale music, but I'm glad for what we have. If you haven't heard of his music, but his name sounds familiar, you might be a basketball fan.

Waymon Tisdale played in the NBA for 12 seasons, amassing 12,000 points and 5,000 rebounds with Indiana, Sacramento, and Phoenix. But when his playing time in the NBA ended, his playing time as a smooth jazz bassist did not. Read the rest of this entry »

This song is by John Lennon, and was released in 1971. It's been covered by many people. It's been quoted in an opinion by the US Supreme Court. It's been used to imagine that "the world will live as one" by Bill Clinton on Shimon Peres 80th birthday.

It's not uncommon for me to buy several covers of a song. In the case of this song, I have the John Lennon version, and it's quite good. I also have covers by David Osborne, Bruce Hornsby, the cast of Glee, and even David Archuleta's version from American Idol.

But my favorite version is Gonzalo Rubalcaba's cover for KCRW, found on Vol 3 of "Rare on Air."

Read the rest of this entry »

It's not a re-launch. That would imply that the blog was ongoing, already; and that I was about to do something really organized in the near future. Neither is the case.

But I was kind of looking for a new project, and I happened across a couple of observations that gave me an idea. First, I was seeing the beginning of the movie "Julie & Julia." The poor girl had just been flogged in the papers by her ex-friend, and was casting about for something to do. She decided to start a blog about the recipes of Julia Child – 500 recipes in 365 days. And since she had passion for the project, she threw herself into it without looking beyond the moment, so to speak.

The second one was a facebook status posted by my friend Dayna Steele. I knew her as a college student, but later she became a fixture in the Houston radio scene. I realized that she spent a large part of her life connecting people to music.

That's when I chose this new direction for this blog. I want to do two things.

Read the rest of this entry »

There are something like 11 million illegal aliens living in the US. The country is full of people with lots of opinions about what to do. And this week, the Federal government filed suit against the state of Arizona over a law related to the topic.

I'm understating the gravity of the issue. People on both sides of this issue are angry. It's difficult to describe the Arizona law without accidentally editorializing – using "value words" that reflect a bias about whether the law is good or bad. I don't intend to describe the specific law or the reaction to it, around the nation and the world – there is plenty of that information elsewhere. Instead, I want to suggest that this problem exists today because we failed in previous attempts to address it. Instead of the hysterical perspective I see everywhere, I want to take a historical perspective.

There are three thoughts that we might entertain today.

• One is about the nature of immigration reform – what has not worked, what has worked, what might work …. how we might go about constructively addressing the issue.
• One is about the history of lingering problems in the US, and what we might learn from them. I'm thinking about fights that lasted centuries, such as slavery, banking, and dealing with the indigenous population. And immigration.
• One is about the long view. On so many issues today, there is a winner and a loser. And if there is ever a decision on a divisive issue, after which we will be united, then the winners and the losers have to live together. For a long time. Living together in a country is often approached as if it were a zero-sum game – that in order for one group to win, another must lose. That's not the only way to play the game.

It won't come as a surprise to anyone who knows me: I'm going to do this backward.

Read the rest of this entry »